Episode 128: What Amish Marriages Teach Us About Lasting Love

 
Episode 128 - What Amish Marriages Teach Us About Lasting Love
Marriage IQ
 
 

Lessons From a Life Without Modern Distractions

What Amish Marriages Can Teach Us About Commitment in a Distracted World

Most couples today don’t struggle because they don’t love each other.

They struggle because they’re exhausted. Overstimulated. Constantly distracted. And trying to build deep emotional connection in a world that quietly pulls them apart.

That’s one of the central reflections shared in a conversation with Enos Hershberger, who grew up Amish in a highly conservative community in rural Minnesota and later chose to leave. His perspective offers a rare window into a world where divorce is uncommon, commitment is assumed, and marriage is shaped by structure rather than constant choice.

And while his experience is not perfect or without complexity, it raises an uncomfortable question for modern relationships:

What changes when distraction disappears and commitment becomes the default?

A Life Built Without Modern Distractions

Enos grew up on an Amish farm, one of 13 children, in a life shaped by strict cultural boundaries.

No smartphones. No internet. Very limited exposure to modern media. Even photography and video were heavily restricted.

Music, for example, wasn’t casually accessible. Something as simple as listening to country songs as a child carried emotional weight—enjoyment mixed with guilt, because it existed outside the boundaries of what was allowed.

Technology wasn’t just absent; it was intentionally restricted to protect the community from outside influence.

From his perspective, that separation created a very different environment for relationships—especially marriage.

Dating in the Amish Community: Structure Over Romance

Modern dating is often framed as choice-driven, emotionally expressive, and individualistic.

In Enos’s Amish upbringing, dating was structured, communal, and tightly regulated.

Young people couldn’t casually date. At around 16 or 17, youth entered a stage where pairing became possible—but still guided heavily by community involvement.

Even getting together wasn’t private or informal in the modern sense. Friends and community members often played a role in introducing or arranging interactions. Social events like “singings,” where young people gathered to sing and socialize, were key moments where relationships formed.

There was little room for prolonged ambiguity or casual dating culture. Relationships moved toward commitment relatively quickly once mutual interest was established.

Commitment as the Foundation of Marriage

If there is one word that defines Amish marriage culture from Enos’s perspective, it is this:

Commitment.

Marriage is not framed as something constantly renegotiated based on emotional highs and lows. It is understood as a lifelong covenant.

Once a couple marries, separation is not viewed as an option in normal circumstances. That expectation alone shapes behavior, expectations, and endurance within the relationship.

But Enos is careful not to romanticize it completely.

He also acknowledges a difficult truth: strong commitment does not automatically equal emotional health, communication skills, or mutual respect.

Some couples stay together while lacking tools for healthy emotional connection. In some cases, there can even be unaddressed harm within relationships that remains hidden due to cultural structure.

Still, the commitment itself is deeply ingrained—and powerful.

What Happens When Technology Is Removed?

One of the most striking reflections from the conversation is how modern technology changes the landscape of marriage.

Enos observes that today’s world offers constant access to distractions and temptations—especially through phones, social media, and dating platforms.

From his perspective, this creates an environment where emotional dissatisfaction can quickly turn into comparison, escape, or replacement.

In contrast, the Amish structure limits those external options. That restriction doesn’t eliminate struggle, but it does reduce the number of “escape routes” available when marriage becomes difficult.

Instead of turning outward, couples are more likely to face internal challenges directly.

Gender Roles and Daily Life Structure

Another defining aspect of Amish marriage culture is role clarity.

Traditionally, men are providers and women are homemakers. These roles are not typically negotiated in the modern sense—they are assumed and culturally reinforced.

While that structure may feel restrictive from an outside perspective, Enos shares that it also reduces ambiguity around expectations. Each partner understands their primary responsibilities within the family system.

Interestingly, he and his wife—both now outside the Amish community—still found themselves leaning toward a similar structure, though by choice rather than obligation.

For them, it wasn’t about enforcing tradition. It was about aligning roles with strengths, preferences, and family needs.

The Missing Piece: Emotional Connection

One of the most important critiques Enos offers is not about commitment—but about emotional expression.

In his upbringing, affection and emotional communication were not commonly modeled. Even something as simple as parental affection was rare to observe.

As a result, many individuals leave the Amish community with strong values of loyalty and endurance—but limited experience in emotional intimacy, verbal affection, or relational expression.

This creates a gap that must often be learned later in life.

Enos describes intentionally becoming more affectionate and emotionally present with his own children, something he didn’t naturally receive growing up.

A Difficult but Honest Perspective on Modern Marriage

From outside the Amish world, Enos sees a different challenge.

Modern relationships often offer too many choices and too many exits. When conflict arises, it can become easier to imagine a different partner rather than doing the internal work required in the current one.

This doesn’t mean modern marriage is weaker—but it does mean it requires different discipline.

Not just commitment to another person, but commitment to staying present through discomfort.

What We Can Learn Without Copying the System

The goal is not to idealize or replicate Amish culture.

It is to extract something valuable from it.

From this conversation, one principle stands out clearly:

Marriage strengthens when people stay with the challenge long enough to grow through it instead of escaping it.

That doesn’t mean staying in harmful situations. It means recognizing that not every moment of tension is a signal to exit—it is often a signal to look inward.

Final Reflection

Every culture shapes marriage differently.

Some through technology. Some through tradition. Some through freedom. Some through structure.

The Amish perspective, as shared by Enos Hershberger, highlights something modern couples often lose in the noise:

Commitment is not just a feeling. It is a decision that shapes how two people respond when things get hard.

And sometimes, the strongest relationships are not the ones without struggle—but the ones where both people stay long enough to be changed by it.

Previous
Previous

Episode 129: 5 Ways to Build a Deeper, More Passionate Marriage

Next
Next

Episode 127: Half of Men by 50 Have ED—And What It Does to Marriage